Jason Anderson

TMT: It seems you’ve ditched the Wolf Colonel moniker for this album, any particular reason why?
JA: I was never particularly enamored with the WC title to begin with, and as my songs became more uniformly sincere and honest, the move to "Jason Anderson" seemed a natural and exciting one. The last album was credited to JA/WC, as sort of a transitional step.

TMT: It seems that the piano is predominantly featured on the new album, were many of the songs written at the piano or was it later integrated into each song?

JA: A little bit of both. Piano is my first instrument, and in the past few years I’ve really enjoyed using it as a compositional tool, in addition to being a layer in the recording process. Currently, I’m touring with a keyboard—in addition to an acoustic guitar—and it’s been wonderful to play a mix of both guitar and piano-based material.

TMT: How did you hook with Phil and Mirah?
JA: The three of us toured together in August of 2001. Since then we have been friends, travel companions, and frequent collaborators. Phil recorded parts of "Something/Everything!" and I’ve played with Mirah both live and in the studio. I wanted New England to be just as much Phil’s album as mine. To wit, I think the nicest element of the album is how much our relationship shines through, from the duets to the very inclusion of a Mount Eerie song.

TMT: Are your songs personal? When you write do you write from experience or do you create characters?
JA: In the past, my songs were a mix of the deeply personal and the deeply non-sequitor. What’s exciting is that for each New England song, I could tell you what—or who—it is about. The album is very much from the heart and, hopefully, that comes across in a positive, warm way. At the same time, while I am striving to create snapshots of specific people and experiences — ideally with a degree of detail and nuance — the hope is for these lyrics to also have strong universality. Most of NE deals with pretty broad concepts; the human condition, existentialism, pizza, etc.

TMT: Do you enjoy touring or do you consider it a necessary evil?
JA: Oh, gosh, touring. You don’t even know. Really. Touring is so amazing. So vital. Honestly. The thing is, at this point it has so little to do with the actual shows themselves, and everything to do with the adventure. The experience is incredible, and incredibly inspiring. Glorious, scenic drives, friends — old and new — every night, gorgeous conversation, dance parties, laughing so hard. Going out to eat, exchanging mix tapes, and simply that feeling of waking up in a new city and not wanting to leave. Not to even mention the excitement of getting to make something happen every night; getting to sing, to connect, to touch through, to relate. My whole goal in life is to grow and change and to feel more balanced, more connected, to feel free and in the moment; right now, traveling is such a rich, compelling, brilliant catalyst for exactly that. There is so much to see, to feel, and SO MUCH is possible. Fuck!

TMT: Could you talk a little about your influences, be they musicians or writers or artists? Anything recently caught your fancy?
JA: In the past few years I have been overwhelmingly enamored with

"classic" artists who give so much, in terms of passion and energy. People like Bruce Springsteen and Stevie Wonder, whose music just absolutely bursts with joy and intensity. This is inspiring to no end. On a more contemporary front, people like Ted Leo and Andrew WK. Those guys rule.

On a more day-to-day basis, I am influenced strongly by the amazing songwriters involved around K; people like Phil, Mirah, Kyle Field, Khaela Maricich, Adam Forkner. Also: Adrian Orange, Dave Longstreth, Marianna Ritchey, Jona Bechtolt, Bobby Birdman. Even though everyone is making slightly different types of music, there is such an amazing attitude, such a positivity, such a unifying glow beneath it all. It’s so awesome. It’s rich.

Indie music I really like right now: Tilly and the Wall, Son Ambulance, YACHT, The Love Letter Band, Tiger Saw, The Poison Control Center, Thanksgiving, The Parenthetical Girls. There’s so much, though. Doi. This is just amazing stuff that has blown my mind recently.

Mainstream music I really like right now: The Darkness, Kanye West, the new Jessica Simpson jam. My car only has a radio; the tape deck is broken.

TMT: Kerry or Bush? Or Nader?
JA: Neither. Buchanan all the way. Kidding.

Here’s some really boring stuff:

I was a strong Dean supporter, and endlessly frustrated by the way the media buried him after Iowa. The speech Howard made was in a private campaign headquarters, to a huge group of college volunteers who had worked his name for months, only to come in third. So Dean gets up there, makes an impassioned, energetic—in my opinion—INSPIRING speech—so gospel! so Springsteen!—and all of a sudden he is just DONE. You cannot turn on a television or a radio without hearing the mockery. Shame on people like Diane Sawyer for saying, "This could really hurt you, Howard; this behavior was NOT presidential..." At the same time, it made me cringe to hear Dean apologize, further marginalizing his awesomeness. For one, I think that sort of ardor SHOULD be presidential. Too angry? Too enthusiastic? The guy was fired up! GEEZ! If any mildly rational person who had seen Bush’s "state of the union" a week earlier was NOT that worked up, not *that ready* to "take back DC" — as Dean, apparently "insanely,"

put it then they must have been without a pulse. I mean, did people even LISTEN to what he said in that now infamous speech? Or did they just listen to everyone in the press calling him "crazy" and "angry?" It’s such a bummer. Boo!

I am from New Hampshire, and was home for the primaries. I went to see Dean speak and wept. He was a realist, he was a believer. And he made ME believe that America could be great, which is saying a lot. People always babble on about how "it hasn’t been the same since Kennedy..."and how they want someone who really stands for things. Dean brought the platform. Dean did more for the Democratic Party than anyone. It’s almost like, the more you actually stand FOR something, the more pushed to edges you become. Don’t get me wrong, I love Nader to death, and Kucinich was fantastic, but what excited me about Dean was that it felt he had such a tangible momentum to ACTUALLY contend. He was OUR guy, and he was doing GREAT. In a bizarre, almost Orwellian way, it doesn’t surprise me that Kerry is now the front runner, as he is the LAST person I wanted to see up there. Even as we live in a time where the incumbent is so thoroughly reviled by an overwhelming amount of people, I could honestly see John Kerry losing (I could!), and that angers me. The Bush re-election campaign, I fear, is going to be so mean-spirited, conniving and underhanded, and the republicans are just going to LOVE taking Kerry down. They are going to turn him into a cross between Al Gore and Mike Dukakis, and tear that guy a new one. I think, down the stretch, people who were scared into voting for Kerry at the primaries — people who thought, "Oh wait, Dean’s a maniac, Dean can’t win..." — might realize that someone like Dean would have been much more tough, down the stretch, against George W. UGH! It’s so infuriating.

Who knows.

Of COURSE I want Kerry to win, even though I’m not sure what would change. Amid all the rhetoric and vote-getting, jingoistic cries of "BRING IT ON," it’s tough to figure out where he really stands. I think what’s most crucial is to think of potential supreme court nominees in the next four years, as this could have great, longstanding repercussions, in terms of issues like abortion and gay rights. Bush is obviously very frightened of the wheels of change. I think this is a very exciting time to be alive, re: the awesome progress made in the gay movement, and I would imagine it is not unlike the time of civil rights or women’s suffrage, just looking at the growing trend of tolerance and enlightenment. It’s exciting to look back a decade, and think about the steps that have been taken. Now, in places like Massachusetts, San Francisco, Portland, and Seattle — all within the past three months, there have been huge developments on this—marriage, civil unions, etc — and yet Bush continues to lament the radicals, the "focus groups," the activist Judges... basically trying to say, "Don’t listen to this insignificant group of freaks..." And yet, it’s SOOOOOOOO clear these are not isolated incidents. This is change. IN ACTION. People are becoming less prejudiced, more open-minded, and this weird talk of amending the constitution feels like sort of a panicked, frantic grasp by Bush and his archaic way of thinking to take one last stab at hindering progress and true equality.

Sheesh.